SOC 1 vs SOC 2: Complete Comparison Guide
Complete comparison guide to help you understand the key differences between SOC 1 and SOC 2 audits and choose the right compliance framework for your organization.
SOC 1 vs SOC 2 Overview
Both SOC 1 and SOC 2 are audit frameworks developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), but they serve different purposes and address different aspects of service organization controls.
SOC 1 - Service Organization Control Type 1
Primary Focus: Financial reporting controls
Target Audience: User entities' financial auditors
Main Purpose: Evaluate controls that could impact client financial statements
Key Characteristics:
- SSAE 18 standard
- Financial controls focus
- Restricted use reports
- User entity auditor review
SOC 2 - Service Organization Control Type 2
Primary Focus: Security, availability, and privacy controls
Target Audience: Management, customers, and stakeholders
Main Purpose: Evaluate controls related to Trust Service Criteria
Key Characteristics:
- AT-C 105 standard
- Trust Service Criteria
- Restricted or general use
- Broader stakeholder focus
Quick Decision Guide: Choose SOC 1 if your services could impact client financial reporting. Choose SOC 2 if you handle customer data and need to demonstrate security and operational controls.
Key Differences
Purpose & Scope
- SOC 1: Financial reporting controls that could impact user entities' financial statements
- SOC 2: Security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy controls
Target Audience
- SOC 1: External auditors of user entities and their management
- SOC 2: Management, customers, regulators, and other stakeholders
Report Distribution
- SOC 1: Restricted use - only for user entities and their auditors
- SOC 2: Restricted or general use depending on report type
Standards Framework
- SOC 1: SSAE 18 (Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements)
- SOC 2: AT-C 105 and TSC (Trust Service Criteria)
Audit Period
- SOC 1: Type I: Point in time | Type II: 6-12 months
- SOC 2: Type I: Point in time | Type II: 3-12 months
Typical Cost Range
- SOC 1: $15,000 - $50,000 (Medium Cost)
- SOC 2: $20,000 - $100,000+ (Higher Cost)
SOC 1 Deep Dive
Understanding SOC 1 Audits
SOC 1 reports focus on controls at a service organization that are relevant to user entities' internal control over financial reporting (ICFR). These reports are essential when service organizations perform functions that could materially impact their clients' financial statements.
What SOC 1 Covers
Financial Transaction Processing:
- Controls over transaction initiation, authorization, recording, and processing
Data Integrity:
- Controls ensuring completeness and accuracy of financial data
System Access:
- Controls over logical access to systems handling financial data
Change Management:
- Controls over changes to systems processing financial transactions
Backup and Recovery:
- Controls ensuring availability and recoverability of financial data
Typical SOC 1 Service Organizations
- Payroll Service Providers: Companies processing payroll for client organizations
- Claims Processing: Insurance claims processing services
- Investment Management: Firms managing client investment portfolios
- Loan Servicing: Companies servicing mortgage or other loans
- Benefits Administration: Third-party benefits administrators
- Trust Services: Corporate trust and fiduciary services
SOC 1 Control Objectives
Transaction Processing Controls:
- Controls over transaction authorization
- Controls over transaction completeness
- Controls over transaction accuracy
- Controls over cut-off procedures
Information Technology Controls:
- Logical access controls
- Program change controls
- Computer operations controls
- Data backup and recovery controls
SOC 2 Deep Dive
Understanding SOC 2 Audits
SOC 2 reports focus on controls relevant to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. These reports are designed for a broad range of stakeholders who need assurance about the service organization's systems and controls.
Trust Service Criteria (TSC)
Security (Mandatory): The system is protected against unauthorized access (both physical and logical).
Availability (Optional): The system is available for operation and use as committed or agreed.
Processing Integrity (Optional): System processing is complete, valid, accurate, timely, and authorized.
Confidentiality (Optional): Information designated as confidential is protected as committed or agreed.
Privacy (Optional): Personal information is collected, used, retained, disclosed, and disposed of in accordance with the entity's privacy notice.
Typical SOC 2 Service Organizations
- Cloud Service Providers: SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS providers
- Data Centers: Colocation and hosting facilities
- Software Companies: Application service providers
- Healthcare Technology: Electronic health record providers
- Financial Technology: Payment processors and fintech companies
- Cybersecurity Firms: Security service providers
- Telecommunications: Communication service providers
- Managed Service Providers: IT outsourcing companies
- Data Analytics: Business intelligence and analytics platforms
- HR Technology: Human resources management systems
Side-by-Side Comparison
Aspect | SOC 1 | SOC 2 |
---|---|---|
Primary Purpose | Financial reporting controls | Operational and security controls |
Applicable Standard | SSAE 18 | AT-C 105 and TSC |
Control Framework | User entity's financial reporting needs | Trust Service Criteria (5 categories) |
Mandatory Criteria | Financial reporting controls (varies by service) | Security (other 4 criteria optional) |
Target Audience | User entity auditors and management | Customers, prospects, regulators, partners |
Report Distribution | Restricted use only | Restricted or general use |
Marketing Value | Limited | High |
Competitive Advantage | Minimal | Significant |
Customer Demand | Required by specific clients | Increasingly expected across industries |
Implementation Timeline | 4-8 months | 6-12 months |
Annual Cost Range | $15K - $50K | $20K - $100K+ |
Regulatory Compliance | Supports SOX compliance | Supports various data protection regulations |
Decision Framework
Do you provide services that could impact your clients' financial statements?
Examples: Payroll processing, investment management, loan servicing, benefits administration, transaction processing
YES - Consider SOC 1
You likely need SOC 1 if:
- Your services affect client financial reporting
- Client auditors need to assess your controls
- You handle financial transactions or data
- Clients are subject to SOX requirements
NO - Consider SOC 2
You likely need SOC 2 if:
- You handle customer data or personal information
- You provide technology services
- Customers ask about your security practices
- You want competitive differentiation
Can You Have Both?
Yes! Some organizations maintain both SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports. SOC 1 for clients who need financial reporting assurance, and SOC 2 for broader stakeholder confidence in security and operational controls.
Industry Use Cases
Industries That Typically Need SOC 1
Common Industries: Payroll Services, Investment Management, Loan Servicing, Benefits Administration, Claims Processing, Transfer Agents, Trust Services, Clearing Houses
Real-World Examples:
- ADP (Payroll): Processes payroll for thousands of companies, directly impacting their financial statements
- State Street (Custody): Provides custody services for institutional investors
- Computershare (Transfer Agent): Manages shareholder records and dividend payments
- Aon Hewitt (Benefits): Administers employee benefit plans
Industries That Typically Need SOC 2
Common Industries: SaaS Providers, Cloud Services, Data Centers, Healthcare IT, Fintech, Cybersecurity, MSPs, EdTech
Real-World Examples:
- Salesforce (SaaS): CRM platform handling customer data
- AWS (Cloud): Infrastructure services requiring security assurance
- Zoom (Communications): Video conferencing platform with privacy concerns
- Epic (Healthcare): Electronic health record system
Cost Comparison
SOC 1 Costs
Cost Component | Range |
---|---|
Initial Assessment | $3,000 - $8,000 |
Gap Remediation | $5,000 - $15,000 |
Annual Audit (Type II) | $15,000 - $35,000 |
Internal Resources | $10,000 - $25,000 |
Total Annual | $33,000 - $83,000 |
Cost Factors:
- Scope of services covered
- Complexity of control environment
- Number of control objectives
- Geographic locations
- Auditor experience and reputation
SOC 2 Costs
Cost Component | Range |
---|---|
Initial Assessment | $5,000 - $12,000 |
Gap Remediation | $15,000 - $50,000 |
Annual Audit (Type II) | $25,000 - $75,000 |
Internal Resources | $20,000 - $50,000 |
Total Annual | $65,000 - $187,000 |
Cost Factors:
- Number of Trust Service Criteria selected
- Organizational size and complexity
- Technology infrastructure scope
- Current security maturity level
- Need for security tool implementations
Return on Investment: While SOC 2 typically costs more upfront, it often provides greater ROI through competitive advantage, customer acquisition, and premium pricing opportunities. SOC 1 is usually driven by client requirements rather than competitive positioning.
Implementation Timeline
SOC 1 Implementation Timeline (10 months)
Month 1 - Planning Phase:
- Define scope and service commitments
- Select auditor and establish timeline
- Conduct initial risk assessment
Months 2-3 - Control Design:
- Document control objectives and activities
- Design and implement new controls
- Create control documentation
Months 4-9 - Testing Period:
- Allow controls to operate for testing period
- Collect evidence of control operation
- Conduct management testing
Month 10 - Audit Phase:
- Auditor performs testing procedures
- Address any identified deficiencies
- Complete audit and issue report
SOC 2 Implementation Timeline (13 months)
Months 1-2 - Planning Phase:
- Select Trust Service Criteria
- Conduct comprehensive risk assessment
- Define system boundaries and scope
Months 3-6 - Control Implementation:
- Implement security and operational controls
- Deploy monitoring and logging systems
- Establish policies and procedures
Months 7-12 - Testing Period:
- Allow controls to operate for audit period
- Conduct internal assessments
- Gather evidence and documentation
Month 13 - Audit Phase:
- External auditor testing and validation
- Remediate any control deficiencies
- Finalize audit and receive report
Expert Recommendations
1. Start with Business Need
Don't choose an audit type based on industry alone. Evaluate your specific business model, customer requirements, and strategic objectives.
Action Items:
- Survey your customers about their requirements
- Review contracts for audit clauses
- Assess competitive landscape
- Consider regulatory requirements
2. Consider Future Growth
Think about where your business will be in 2-3 years. What started as a SOC 1 need might evolve into SOC 2 requirements as you grow.
Action Items:
- Evaluate planned service expansions
- Consider target customer segments
- Assess technology roadmap
- Plan for international expansion
3. Maximize ROI
Choose the audit that provides the greatest return on investment through customer satisfaction, competitive advantage, and risk mitigation.
Action Items:
- Calculate potential revenue impact
- Assess risk reduction benefits
- Consider operational improvements
- Evaluate marketing and sales value
Pro Tip: Dual Approach
For organizations that serve both financial and technology markets, consider maintaining both SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports. This provides comprehensive coverage and positions you for maximum market opportunities.
Example: A payroll company might need SOC 1 for its core payroll services but SOC 2 for its employee self-service portal and mobile applications.
Conclusion
Still unsure which audit is right for you? Our compliance experts can help you evaluate your specific needs and choose the right SOC audit approach for your organization.